雅思阅读高分技巧
雅思阅读题型多，内容涉及面广，只要掌握了正确的阅读方法，才能够以最快的速度读题;审题;答题，这样才能够控制好雅思阅读题的答题速度，才能给难题留出思考的时间来。所以要及时更正自己的学习方法，才是提高雅思阅读的关键点。下面是小编为您收集整理的雅思阅读高分技巧，供大家参考!
雅思阅读高分技巧
生活中，不同文化有不同的观念，往往带来认识上的偏差和误区，这也反映在日常的英语学习。
不同需要有不同的阅读方法
中国学生习惯于采取细读的方法进行阅读，也就是说，从左边一个字一个字地读到右边，再下一行。这样，速度很慢，而且影响阅读质量。一来，浪费时间，如果遇到不懂的地方，读得再慢还是不懂;二来，如果是内容比较浅的话，精力容易分散，阅读质量反倒不升。
西方学生阅读时往往更注重于根据不同的阅读需要采取相对应的阅读方法来最有效地获取信息，谋求更好、更到位的理解。
学会提取段落主题句是关键
一般中国老师在小学的时候就开始教学生概括段落大意，但是方法是通篇全读，领悟后自行总结。
西方老师的方法就不一样，根据西方段落写作的特点，段落的主旨是通过topicsentence(主题句)凸显出来的。老师在教学生概括段落大意时，会先教会学生根据段落结构的不同，主题句出现的位置不同去提取主题句，从而得到整段的段落大意。这就和中国学生的阅读方式有很大的不同了。所以，往往中国学生在做雅思题目时，因为没有这种做题的习惯，就往往提取不了段落主题句，通篇全读好几遍，依然无法确定其段落大意，以至答错题或没法答题了。
考察通过阅读提取信息能力
雅思阅读考试是针对同学们出去读书的实际需要，测试同学不同的通过阅读获取信息的阅读技巧。这些阅读技巧包括：scanning(查读)、skimming(略读)和intensivereading(精读)。根据不同的题型的具体要求，考生应相对应地用不同的解题方法进行高速解题。
在雅思阅读考试的过程中，经常会出现很多考生都不知道那些答案是什么意思，但就可以找到答案的情况出现。因为，雅思阅读考试的相当一大部分的侧重点是考察考生通过阅读提取信息的能力，而不是考考生对信息真正领悟的能力。
如果我们用中国阅读的老办法来进行雅思阅读的话，会因为速度过慢而不能在规定的时间内完成答卷，造成不必要的损失。
学生应学会提高阅读速度，增强阅读能力，这样既能考好雅思考试，也能顺当地适应外国留学所需要的大量阅读。
雅思阅读材料：Mars
雅思阅读考试中涉及的知识面很广，有的甚至是同学们平时很少接触到的信息，比如关于科技类的的雅思阅读材料，这篇雅思阅读材料的主要内容是介绍了火星以及科学家登陆火星的一些计划等等。以下就是详细内容，供大家参考，希望对大家在冲刺雅思阅读上能有所帮助。
Missions to Mars: a rocky road to the Red Planet
Missions to Mars may have stalled, but the search for signs of life continues – by analysing the 'DNA' of Martian meteorites, writes Roger Highfield.
雅思阅读材料：Mars
Are we alone in the cosmos? For centuries, that question has been purely speculative. But in recent years scientists have gathered evidence of alien life on Mars that is as tantalising as it is inconclusive.
We thought we might have a definitive answer in 2003, when Britain's ￡50 million Beagle 2 probe was scheduled to touch down on the Red Planet, carrying an instrument that could have detected traces of living things. But we never heard from the little probe again.
The loss was a massive disappointment to the professor behind the mission, Colin Pillinger of the Open University. During the late Nineties, I had seen him doggedly enlist support for the project from fellow space scientists, the government and even the likes of Blur and the artist Damien Hirst.
The European Space Agency promised Prof Pillinger that there would be a follow-up programme, with a mission as soon as 2007. That date slipped back again and again. The Mars mission is now scheduled for 2018, when a joint mission with Nasa is due to send two rovers to search for life. Towards the end of this year, Nasa will launch the Mars Science Laboratory mission, which will set down a rover called Curiosity that will study whether conditions have ever been favourable for microbial life.
There is, however, another way to answer this giant question. In 1989, Prof Pillinger's team found organic material, typical of that left by the remains of living things on Earth, in a meteorite called EETA79001. This is one of a relatively small number of rocks – fewer than 100 – that chemical analysis reveals must have been blasted off the surface of the Red Planet by an asteroid impact and then subsequently fallen to Earth.
The Open University team stopped short of saying they had discovered life on Mars – but, in 1996, Everett Gibson and his colleagues at Nasa announced that they believed that they had discovered a fossil no bigger than a nanometre in another meteorite, known as ALH84001, which had fallen to Earth roughly 13,000 years ago. Other researchers, studying the data collected by America's Viking landers, which touched down in 1976, concluded that life signs had been detected then, too.
Sceptics – and there are many – remain convinced that inorganic (non-living) processes could have produced the same data and features that have been interpreted by some as signs of microbial life. But how can we even tell these rocks came from Mars?
Well, a few days ago, I found myself back at the Open University, to test another Martian meteorite, which we will offer as a prize to readers of New Scientist in the next issue. I bought it from Luc Labenne, a well-known collector based in France. It was a piece of a rock that crashed into the desert in Algeria, hence the designation NWA2975 ("North-West Africa").
One measure of its rarity is its astonishing value – one 102g sample of the same rock is on sale for 0,000 (our prize is 1.7g). To ensure that it was genuine, I enlisted the help of Prof Pillinger's colleagues. Andy Tindle studied a slide of NWA2975 provided by Ted Bunch of Northern Arizona University, a member of the team who originally described the meteorite in 2005. This revealed a mixture of rounded desert sand grains and various minerals of the kind found on Mars, such as pyroxene, which contains manganese and iron in a ratio typical of the Red Planet.
To make absolutely sure, Richard Greenwood and Jenny Gibson removed around ten-thousandths of a gram for further analysis. Using an instrument called a mass spectrometer (think of it as an atomic weighing machine), they studied the relative abundance in the meteorite's silicate minerals of three isotopes of oxygen – oxygen-16, oxygen-17 and oxygen-18. They were released for analysis with the help of a laser and a powerful reagent.
Because the relative abundance of these isotopes varies throughout the solar system, it is possible to use them like a DNA test in order to identify whether a meteorite comes from the Moon, an asteroid or Mars. In this case, they found a slight excess in the abundance of oxygen-17 and oxygen-18 compared with rocks from Earth, just as we would expect from a Martian rock.
What this tells us is that we don't have to go to Mars to get all kinds of insights into the Red Planet. We can reveal a lot simply by studying its meteorites to reveal data from the composition of the atmosphere to the presence of water. And, of course, these meteorites offer us a welcome opportunity to search for life signs, as we wait for the next mission to land on the planet's dusty, pink surface.
以上就是关于火星以及科学家登陆火星的一些计划的雅思阅读材料的全部内容，非常详细的介绍了相关的话题，大家可以在备考雅思阅读考试和雅思小作文的时候，对这篇文章进行适当的参考和阅读。