雅思写作动物医药实验话题解析
为了让大家对雅思写作中动物医药实验这类话题能够得心应手，下面小编给大家整理了一些此类话题的相关解析。
雅思写作话题素材:动物医药实验
1. Animals are sometimes used in order to assess the effect of medicines and cosmetics on humans, but to what extent are they j necessary?
动物通常被用于测试人类医药和化妆品的效果，在多大程度上言他们是必要的?
2. The most common argument against such experiments is that they are cruel.
反对这种实验最常用的论据是他们太残酷了。
3. Cruelty suggests that the animals used in the experiments undergo some kind of pain, discomfort or deformity.
残酷意味着这些实验中用到的动物需要承受一些痛苦，不适，或者变成残疾。
4. This is understandably upsetting to many, who imagine the rabbit, mouse or frog that they cared for as a child having to endure such things.
对于那些把饲养的小动物如兔子，老鼠或青蛙视为小孩子一样照料的人们来说，听到这些动物要遭受这样的痛苦，感到悲痛是可以理解的。
5. The fewer cosmetic products people use, the fewer animals they have to slaughter.
人们用的化妆产品越少，屠杀的动物也会越少。
6. I do not think of a single item of toiletry which would justify pain or death to an animal.
我想不出任何一种化妆用品能证明动物(在实验中)经受的痛苦甚至死亡是有合理的。
7. There should be a body to monitor such experiments, paid for by the companies and organizations conducting them.
需要有一个团体要监控这类实验，费用由进行此类实验的公司和机构支付。
8. It is an undeniable fact that animals play a vital role in maintaining the subtle balance of the earth’s ecological system.
动物在维持地球生态平衡上扮演着重要的角色，这是一个不可否认的事实。
9. The gaining of first-hand knowledge aid information about certain species provides adequate justification for continuing the killing of animals in laboratories.
获得关于某一物种的第一手知识与信息，成为继续在实验室杀害动物的合理辩护理由。
10. The protection of human beings from certain epidemics at the cost of lives of some animals justifies the work of researchers.
以一些动物的生命为代价是为了保护人类免受传染病之害，这也成为维护研究人员此类工作的辩词。
11. They cite the accumulated knowledge about those animals as contributing to their survival.
他们举证说明逐渐积累起来的关于这些动物的知识也会为它们的生存做出贡献。
12. For the people who wish to see the legal prohibition of such experiments, animal rights, especially the right to exist on the same planet with human beings, is always at the top of their list.
对于那些希望法律禁止此类动物实验的人来说，动物权益，尤其是动物与人类生活在同一星球上的权利，是他们的首要论据。
13. They worry about species that are already on the verge of extinction.
他们担心那些濒临灭绝的物种。
雅思写作题目解析：动物医药实验
Some people think it is necessary to use animals for testing medicines
intended for human use. Others, however, think it is not right to do that.
Discuss both of these views and give you own opinion.
有人认为小动物实验对于人类有益，有认为人们没有权利用动物实验，讨论两种观点，给出你的意见?
思路拓展：
反对小动物实验：
1. 生命是平等的，不该伤害小动物;小动物的基本生存权利不可被剥夺。
2. 从道德角度看是不对的;小动物实验不道德，很残忍。
3. 小动物实验如果合法化，这种权利可能会被滥用。
支持小动物实验：
1. 科学家把科技的进步归结给为实验做出了巨大贡献的小动物们;因为用动物实验便于观察小动物，小动物在一些方面和人类是有共性的。
2. 小动物实验减少了临床实验的可能，对于新药的研发推广有重要的意义;(药品;化妆品;化学产品)
原创语料库：
1. Animal experimentation will enable people to know more about themselves,
for there are many similarities between human race and animals. Therefore, the
results of scientific research can help people to get further knowledge about
mankind. 实验的结果可以帮助人们更多的了解人类。
2. Every year, a great many animals undergo painful suffering or death
because of scientific research into the effects of drugs, food additives and
other chemical products. 每一年，由于研发药品，化妆品和其他的化学产品，很多小动物经历了痛苦和死亡。
3. Scientists owe medical advances to the animals which make substantial
contributions to the experiment. 科学家把医疗的进步归结给为实验做出了巨大贡献的小动物们。
4. minimize the frequency of clinic experimentation v 减少了临床实验的频率。
5. Virtually, animal experiment is an abuse of animal life and an obvious
violation of the basic right of subsistence.
实际上，动物实验是对动物的生命的践踏，是对动物的基本生存权利的公然侵犯。
6. Consequently, animal experiment is immoral and an act of cruelty.
因此小动物实验是不道德的，是一种残忍的行为。
7. A heated debate springs up as to whether or not animal experimentation
should be conducted. 人们就是否应该进行动物实验展开了激烈的争论。
8. I cannot accept the fact that many pitiful animals are used in finding
cure for some infectious diseases. 我不能接受无数可怜动物被用来找寻传染病的治疗方法。
9. Animal should receive better care and treatment. 动物应该得到更好的照顾和待遇。
10. Human scientific research, in which animals are subjected to various
experiments should be also condemned. 人类的科学研究拿动物来进行各种实验，这一点应该受到谴责。
雅思写作大作文高分范文：关于动物实验
题目：
Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
中文翻译：
现在动物实验被广泛用于开发新药物和测试其他产品的安全性。 有些人认为这些实验应该被禁止，因为它在道德上是错误的，导致动物受苦，而其他人赞成他们，因为他们对人类的好处。
讨论这两种观点，并给出自己的意见。
范文：
It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.
On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.
On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a
necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.
(270 words, band 9)
雅思写作范文：动物实验真的必要吗?
Some people think animal experiments should be stopped because they are too cruel. Others think they are necessary for the development of sciences. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
题目讲评：
果然又是老题换个形式之后再出，题目考前给同学讲解过的(到北京来讲课了，但还是总收到长沙A类和G类同学们的来信，说拿到了好分数很高兴。我也很想念你们!)这类文章想素材当然用咱们思考素材四类方法当中的综合法，相加得出观点：动物实验应该继续，但是要尽可能减小动物的痛苦。相应的写四段，大正小负，当然还是小的放在前面写。还是那句话，考IELTS学术类写作想拿高分或者满分永远只要按照English academic writing的规则写英文八股文就成。
1 开头段(不少于4句);2 有一些动物实验确实cruel(五句);3 但是一些领域的研究又不能缺少动物实验(七句);4 综合，得出结论(不少于3句)。创作全程使用IELTS作文cold storage冷处理+assembly line装配法，给自己规定从开始写25分钟内要贴上Google。
高分关键词：friends or foes 或敌或友 subject(vt) animals to experimentation拿动物去做实验unjustifiable站不住脚的,不合适的 necessitate 使……成为必需callous残酷的 confinement 囚禁 veterinary 动物医疗 vaccination 接种 vivisection 活体解剖 rodent 指老鼠那一类动物 primate 灵长类 pragmatic 灵活的追求实效的(pragmatism也是美国人最大的特征)pharmaceutical companies制药公司anthropological and genetic 人类学的和基因学的analgesic, anesthetic and tranquilizing drugs医学当中镇痛最常用的三种方法
Animals were friends or foes of humanity at different times of the human history. In modern times, experiments upon animals have long been a breeding ground for spirited debate. Some animal activists argue that we should ban animal experiments altogether because subjecting animals to experimentation is unjustifiable on moral grounds. Yet some other people contend that the advancement of science necessitates animal testing. Personally, I believe both their views have merit and demerit.
Granted, empirical evidence suggests that many animal experiments are performed callously without any heed to the discomfort or pain that laboratory mammals endure. First and foremost, improper confinement of test animals such as locking them up in cramped cages or poor veterinary is inhumane .It can gravely disrupt natural biological functions of the test animal. Further, the effects of vaccination and vivisection conducted on live rodents, primates and other lab mammals can be gruesome and chilling. They may, in some cases, even constitute sheer torture of live animals.
However, from a more pragmatic perspective, evidence is mounting that animal experimentation is still largely a necessary evil and there is no practical alternative for it at this point. In the first place, it is manifest that drug experimentation on live mammals is far more effectual than experimentation on bacteria or on other lower species in testing drug safety. Drugs that have severe potential side effects on homo sapiens must be tested by pharmaceutical companies on live mammals first to ascertain their toxicity. In the second place, in space research, live animals are still the only viable alternative to humans in testing living creature reaction to outer-space experience on a flight not considered to be sufficiently safe for human astronauts. Lastly, lab research about the behavioral tendencies of chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans and other members of the primate group is also necessary. It produces valuable outcomes consistently advancing anthropological and genetic studies.
To conclude, I concede that experiments upon animals may induce suffering to the test animals. However, I am convinced that there are no feasible alternatives to this methodology at the current stage of scientific development. On balance , I think that we should allow animals testing to be continued but at the same time use techniques such as analgesic, anesthetic and tranquilizing drugs to minimize the pain inflicted upon the test animal and augment the general welfare of these animals.